Out of all furniture needs, the chair might be the imperative one. While the majority of other pieces (except the bed) are intended to support objects, the chair supports our human form. The term chair is viewed here in the wider sense, from stool to throne to developed chairs for example a bench or sofa, which may be considered as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously distinguished.
The social history of the chair is as intriguing as its history as a creative art. The chair is not merely a physical support and an aesthetic piece; it historically was a symbol of social standing. From the past royal courts there were clear signifiers between being led to a chair with arms, sitting on a chair with a back but without arms, or having to make do with a stool. From the recent century, the director’s and/or manager’s chair has developed a signifier of superior rank, and even in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on a higher level.
As a furniture form, the chair can be used for a range of different makes. There are chairs structured to suit man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to indicate his rank in society (the executive chair, the throne). From past days there were chairs for births (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs for ending life (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded for easy storage, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern day living has designated particular chairs in automobiles and aircraft. Every one of these chair shapes has been changed to conform to growing human uses. Because of its close relationship with man, the chair exists to its full significance only when in use. Although it is not relevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a chest of drawers whether there are items inside or not, a chair is really seen best and evaluated by a person sitting in it, for chair and sitter suit one another. Thus the several elements of a chair were labeled like the parts of a human shape: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the principal purpose of your chair is to support the body, its credit is tested firstly on how completely it fulfills this practical purpose. Within the creation of a chair, the maker is restricted for particular static legislation and principal measurements. In these rules, however, the chair creator has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair extended over a period of several thousand years. There are peoples that made distinctive chair types, expressions of the topmost task in the spheres of skill and creativity. Out of these such civilisations, particular note should be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lifetimes of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the upshot of skilled make, are seen from tomb findings. The first of them is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair has four legs designed like those of some animal, a curved seat, and leading to a sloping back supported over vertical stretchers. From this design a durable triangular structure was made. There was in our knowledge no notable differentiation between the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for common people. The general change exists in the level of ornamentation, in the particulars of expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool likely was developed as an easily stored seat for army officers. As a camp stool the type stayed for much later points in time. But the stool also was made for the character of a ceremonial seat, its original role as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can today be found, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, formed in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are in the construction of folding stools but can’t be folded because the seats are made of wood. The simplistic construction of the folding stool, composed of two frames that turn on metal bolts and hold a seat of leather or fabric held between them, then came again but some time later in the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most recognisable of this kind is the folding stool, crafted out of ashwood, now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The typical Greek chair, the klismos, is seen not with any ancient object still in form but as seen from a large amount of pictorial material. The best known is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial ground just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). This is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of these legs would be shown. These curving legs were probably executed in bent wood and were likely to have been put under a large amount of pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints fastening the legs to the frame of the seat are therefore very strong and were visibly indicated.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek design; existing models of seated Romans offer chairs of a more heavyset and which appear to be a rather more crudely designed klismos. Both features, the light or the heavy, were revived in the Classicist time. The klismos influence is known in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in special kinds of notable individuality in Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The ancestry of the chair in China can not be charted as far as the progression of the chair in Egypt and Greece. From the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) a full folio of drawings and paintings had been preserved, detailing the interiors and outer parts of Chinese buildings and the designs of furniture. Also kept since the 16th century are some chairs constructed of wood or lacquered wood, that show an amazing familiarity to styles of older chairs.
Just the same as in Egypt, two major chair forms existed in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. This four-legged chair can be constructed both with or without arms but always having a square seat and straight stiles (upright side supports) to hold up the back. In one type, it has been seen, the stiles are marginally curved above the arms for the purpose of sit right with the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the centre upright of its chairback). The three parts were mortised into the yoke-like top rail. Despite that the idea of the back splat had a foundation for English chairs from the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that only to a particular capability reinforce corner joints (and then are loose in the bargain) signify a signature exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which stops around the rounded staves. Members are round in section or has rounded edges—a left over perhaps to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and had on occasion a plaited form. These chairs demanded of the sitter to remain stiff and upright; for if too much pressure is pushed on the back, the chair has a way of falling over. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this era armchairs most likely were allowed only for senior persons, for they were held in great esteem.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have travelled to China from the West. It does not vary very much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a difference in that the top rail is delicately joined to the two legs of the stool by use of a curved member, which is generally provided with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the overall effect of both of these furniture forms is stylized. The structure and decoration parts are combined in a style that is all at once both naïve and refined. The patched up appearance is an upshot of the way that the individual members do not appear to have been affixed by means of either glue or screws, but had been mortised onto one another and held in position in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also put its name on the chair. Artworks project a design of chair with a relatively crude wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between, stitched to show up a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a similar board at the back could be folded after loosening some little iron hooks. Thus the chair was a portable piece of furniture when traveling which, in the same period, granted the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered type of chair is seen in engravings of the interiors of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this kind of chair might also be seen in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won favour, it is not certain that the style actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Generally, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of slim measurements; they are occasionally baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is obviously a bourgeois piece of furniture and was manufactured in impressive numbers, as can be surmised from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is an entire row of this kind of chairs lined up against a wall. The form asserts itself by its shapely proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that was, as brought out in Paris around 1750—spread through most of Europe and has been imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The model owes its popularity to a combination of leisure and elegance. The seat conforms to the human body and grants a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Normally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are constructed on craftsmanlike methods despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof are made from wood of relatively thick measurements; but every member is deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been taken away, and more expensive designs would be further embellished with special delicate and decorative engraving. The wood might be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is usually used for all upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is occasionally used rather than upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more differentiated in design than the French. The French taste for stylistic uniformity, which came from the highest circles in Paris and Versailles over most of France and was popularised in large parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popularised and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
During the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper styles of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, purport that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office storage in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content